Search

Should your state reject Title IV grants from the federal government under the Social Security Act?

Let's first clarify recent legislation. The Family First Prevention Services Act (Family First) was passed in February 2018. Prior to it passing, states could only receive these grants AFTER a child was separated from their family and placed in foster care. NOW, the grant money can be paid to evidence based services aimed to keep children at home, within the extended families that love them, and both sides of a child's family are supposed to be considered for placement. The potential impact of this Act has not yet been fully realized because almost all of the states have refused to follow the federal guidelines but they still are receiving the grant monies almost 3 years later. The County Welfare Directors Association of California refused to embrace the changes and instead continued to oppose them after the Family First was past. However, California continued to get the grants because, as a state assembly person told me, "We know how to get federal grant money".


The Family First was designed to preventing children from suffering the abuse and/or neglect that we have seen in far too many California foster care homes and institutions. It almost overhauls the current system by making it difficult for California to place children in institutional care that it has emergency, temporary or final legal rights to(think group homes). It provides financial support and resources for extended family that take children into their own homes (like aunts, uncles, grandparents). It improves services to help prevent adults, who were children in foster care system, from traveling down the homelessness pipeline. One of our own foster care youth organizations, here in California, was a reason why the Family First act was passed. We want to thank the California Youth Connection and especially one of its former members, Jordan Sosa. Jordan is this blog's cover image. His siblings grew up in foster care. Losing siblings in foster care is a common occurrence for these children with lifelong damaging consequences. Jordan interned with the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Ways and Means working on the Family First Act and with the Congressional Coalition on Adoption Institute (CCAI) to present a congressional briefing on how the federal government can improve the U.S. child welfare system. We think parents should be focusing their efforts on their County Welfare Director to implement the changes Jordan worked so hard on and make them become a reality.


Jury trial rights in our California juvenile dependency courts will also take the focus off of the targeted parents and instead focus on keeping the child with loved ones. We aren't attempting to stop California from seizing emergency legal rights to children, but we are seeking to stop California from taking temporary, and especially permanent legal rights, of a child from a family member who is better equipped to be the child's legal parent than the state is. We are seeking to prevent unwarranted governmental interference in families and extended families.


In regard to the 10% interest California receives in addition to Title IV grant money to collect on the huge backlog of missing child support payments? That is just ridiculous in today's world and counterproductive.

0 views
  • Black Facebook Icon
  • Black Twitter Icon
  • Black Instagram Icon

Raise Your Rights, 630 Quintana Road, #145, Morro Bay, CA 93442, 805-235-1699, info@RaiseYourRights.org